Which outcome is desired when determining that requirements support each other?

The desired outcome when determining that requirements support each other is fully meeting objectives. When requirements are aligned and reinforce one another, it becomes easier to achieve the overall goals of a project. This synergy between requirements ensures that they collectively address the needs and expectations of stakeholders, leading to a more coherent and effective solution.

When requirements do not conflict and instead support each other, it allows for a more streamlined development process. This can result in enhanced clarity, reduced ambiguity, and a stronger foundation for decision-making throughout the project lifecycle. Fully meeting objectives means that the end product or solution not only fulfills the specified requirements but also satisfies the broader business goals and stakeholder needs.

In contrast, outcomes like increased project duration, reduction in project documentation, and decreased stakeholder involvement do not contribute positively to the objective of ensuring that requirements align and support each other. These outcomes may impede efficiency, hinder clarity, and reduce stakeholder engagement, which are counterproductive to the goal of achieving a successful project outcome.