Which frameworks are predetermined sets of models used to represent diverse perspectives in requirements analysis?

In the context of requirements analysis, methodologies and frameworks serve as structured approaches to understand and document requirements from various perspectives. This choice emphasizes that these frameworks offer a predetermined set of models that can be utilized to ensure comprehensive coverage of stakeholder needs, business goals, and system functionalities. By implementing these established structures, practitioners can systematically gather and analyze requirements, facilitating clearer communication and understanding among different stakeholders involved in a project.

Other options represent relevant concepts but do not specifically address the notion of predetermined sets of models for diverse perspectives in requirements analysis. Project management frameworks focus more on overall project execution rather than the intricate details of requirements gathering. Agile methodologies, while offering flexibility and iterative development, do not inherently provide a structured set of models for capturing diverse perspectives—rather, they emphasize collaboration and responsiveness to change. Stakeholder engagement models pertain to strategies for involving stakeholders but do not constitute a comprehensive framework of models for requirements analysis. Hence, methodologies and frameworks distinctly fit the description of providing a structured approach to analyze requirements from multiple viewpoints.